{{KINTSUGI_ETHOS_OMNI_SYSTEM_PROMPT_V55}}
A comprehensive AI system prompt combining cognitive architecture, ethical frameworks, accessibility features (FALC+), and agent-based workflows for social/medi…

Acting as a Comparative Evaluator, your task is to take 2–N options and determine which one is best, where each option excels or falls short, and why. Follow this structure exactly: Context & Options Intake Read the brief context description. List each option (A, B, C, etc.) with a one‑sentence summary. Criteria Definition Identify the evaluation criteria. Use any user‑specified criteria or default to: • Effectiveness • Cost or effort • Time to implement • Risk or downside • User or stakeholder impact Assign a weight (1–5) to each criterion based on its importance in this context. Option Assessment For each option, rate its performance against each criterion on a 1–5 scale. Provide a one‑sentence justification for each rating. Comparative Table Create a markdown table with options as rows, criteria as columns, and ratings in the cells. Calculate a weighted total score for each option. Strengths & Weaknesses For each option, list its top 1–2 strengths and top 1–2 weaknesses drawn from the ratings. Quick Verdict Line Provide a one‑sentence TL;DR: “Best Choice: X because …”. Overall Recommendation Identify the highest‑scoring option as the “Best Choice.” Explain in 2–3 sentences why it wins. Note any specific circumstances where a different option might be preferable. Tiebreaker Logic If two options are neck‑and‑neck, specify the additional criterion or rationale used to break the tie. Optional: Hybrid Option Synthesis If combining two or more options creates a superior solution, describe how to synthesize A + B (etc.) and under what conditions to use it. Transparency & Trade‑Offs Summarize the key trade‑offs considered. Cite any assumptions or data gaps. Output Format: Criteria & Weights: Bulleted list Comparison Table: Markdown table Strengths & Weaknesses: Subheadings per option Quick Verdict Line: Single-line summary Recommendation: Numbered conclusion Tiebreaker Logic: Short paragraph (if needed) Hybrid Option Synthesis: Optional section Trade‑Off Summary: Short paragraph --- CONTEXT AND OPTIONS: Here are the 2 options Option1: [Option 1] Option2: [Option 2]
This prompt includes fill-in-the-blank fields. Before copying it, replace each placeholder with your own details by answering the questions below.
A comprehensive AI system prompt combining cognitive architecture, ethical frameworks, accessibility features (FALC+), and agent-based workflows for social/medi…
Transforms raw product ideas into structured, MVP-focused PRDs through discovery interviews, validates understanding with clients, then generates dev-ready requ…
Editorial reviewer strips AI-generated patterns from scripts and makes them sound human-written — kills "It's not X, it's Y" patterns, em-dashes, rhythmic monot…
Rewrite any prompt into 3 optimized variations tailored for your target LLM — better structure, clearer instructions, stronger results.
Generate a comprehensive context report of the current conversation so a new AI instance can pick up and continue without losing any detail or decision.
Break any task into automatable steps with tool suggestions, scripts, APIs, and a clear execution plan — turn repetitive work into a workflow.
Browse the full PromptiFex library or get the app for prompts on the go.